Eligible employees have a federal right to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave
The employer is not making a legal argument — they are making a threat. The statement 'don't expect to come back' is not a description of lawful employer discretion; it is an attempt to coerce the employee into abandoning a federally protected right through fear of economic harm. This is not only morally wrong — it is a federal statutory violation. The FMLA specifically prohibits employers from 'interfering with, restraining, or denying' the exercise of FMLA rights. A threat that your job will disappear if you take qualifying leave is textbook interference. The fallacy is presenting this coercive statement as though it reflects a legitimate business reality — as if the law simply does not apply because the employer finds it inconvenient. Workers who internalize this threat and decline to take needed medical leave suffer a double harm: they lose both their health and their legal rights. The employer's statement is designed to make the worker feel that the choice is theirs when in reality the law has already made it: the employer cannot take adverse action against an eligible employee for exercising FMLA rights.
After you respond, they may push back with these arguments. Members get the full rebuttal for each.