A patient is pressured to pay a medical bill shortfall out of pocket despite having insurance intended to cover it.
The provider assumes that because the insurance did not cover the full amount, the patient is automatically and immediately liable for the balance. This ignores the existence of supplementary coverage as a legitimate financial instrument intended to settle such shortfalls. The patient has the right to ensure all insurance avenues are exhausted before being held personally liable for the difference.
After you respond, they may push back with these arguments. Members get the full rebuttal for each.