A community's water supply has been cut off for weeks due to broken municipal infrastructure, with the municipality citing budget constraints as a reason not to provide emergency water.
The municipality is using a budget shortfall to defer a constitutional obligation. But the Constitutional Court has made clear that socio-economic rights like the right to water impose a duty on government to take reasonable measures — including emergency measures — within its available resources. The Constitution's Section 27(2) requires progressive realisation; it does not permit indefinite suspension of access due to administrative or financial difficulties.
After you respond, they may push back with these arguments. Members get the full rebuttal for each.