A person is excluded from a leadership position solely on the basis of their gender
Freeintermediate8 minutesDomain 2 of 119
The Situation
What They Said
“You cannot hold this position — we need a man in this role. The team will not respect a woman leading them.”
This phrase is used in a workplace, community organisation, or religious institution to block a qualified woman from taking on a leadership role by appealing to anticipated team dynamics rather than her actual qualifications or performance.
Your Response
How to Respond
This law is about retirement procedures, not about gender qualifications for a position. It does not permit discrimination based on gender.
Now say it out loud. The Advocate walks you through this scenario with audio, law references, and Scripture — so the words come out right when it matters.
This argument is circular: the assumption is that women are not respected as leaders, and the conclusion is that women should therefore not be leaders. This reasoning perpetuates the very bias it relies on, and it attributes anticipated team prejudice as a legitimate basis for an exclusionary decision. The logical flaw is that the employer's hypothetical team dynamics do not override an individual's right to equal treatment in employment.
What the Law Says
Your Legal Foundation
Ley de Contrato de Trabajo 20.744
art. 17 de la Ley de Contrato de Trabajo — Equal treatment in employment
“The employer may require the worker to initiate the relevant procedures, providing him with the certificates of services and other necessary documentation for that purpose.”
This law does not address gender discrimination in leadership roles; it concerns retirement procedures. Therefore, it does not apply to the situation described.
What Scripture Says
God's Word on This
Judges 4:4 (NET)
“Now Deborah, a prophetess, wife of Lappidoth, was leading Israel at that time.”
Deborah led the nation of Israel as a judge — the biblical record shows a woman exercising national leadership with full divine endorsement.
Proverbs 31:26 (NET)
“She opens her mouth with wisdom, and loving instruction is on her tongue.”
Scripture presents authoritative speech and instruction as marks of the honourable woman — not as characteristics that disqualify her from leading others.
Practice
Drill Prompt
If the other party says, 'But the law says the employer can require procedures, so we can require you to step down,' you should respond: 'That provision is about retirement benefits, not about leadership roles. It does not allow discrimination against women. The law does not support your position.'
What They'll Say Next
Blindside Counter-Arguments
After you give your response, they may push back. Here is how to handle each counter-argument.
They might say: “The law allows the employer to require procedures, so we can require you to follow our rules.”
Your response: The law only applies to retirement procedures, not to gender-based restrictions on leadership. It does not grant employers the right to discriminate.
They might say: “This law is about maintaining the employment relationship, so we can maintain you in a non-leadership role.”
Your response: The law's maintenance provision is tied to retirement procedures, not to reassigning roles based on gender. It does not justify blocking a woman from leadership.
Hear Your Rebuttal Out Loud
Audio playback, word-by-word highlighting, self-assessment drills, and 137 scenarios across 17 Argentine law domains. Free to start — no credit card needed.