⚖ The Advocate
Privacy Rights

My Personal Data Was Shared Without Consent

An entity shares personal information with third parties without authorisation.

Premium intermediate 8 minutes
The Situation

What They Said

“We shared your contact details with our partners — it is in our terms and conditions.”
An entity discloses personal data — phone numbers, email addresses, financial details — to third parties, citing broad terms and conditions that the individual never meaningfully agreed to.
The Fallacy

Buried Consent in Terms and Conditions

Consent buried in lengthy terms and conditions — particularly when it is not clearly brought to a person's attention — is not meaningful consent under data protection principles. Such principles require that consent be specific, informed, and freely given. A blanket clause in fine print authorising unlimited data sharing with unnamed 'partners' does not meet this standard. The sophistication of the legal document does not excuse the violation of the consent principle.

What the Law Says

Your Legal Foundation

Ley 25.326 de Protección de los Datos Personales
art. 5 de la Ley 25.326 — Personal Data Protection
“The processing of personal data is unlawful when the data subject has not given their free, express and informed consent, which must be recorded in writing or by an equivalent means, according to the circumstances.”
The company's disclosure of personal data to third parties based on broad terms and conditions that the user never meaningfully agreed to likely violates Article 5, as the consent was not freely, expressly, and informedly given, and was not properly recorded.
What Scripture Says

God's Word on This

Luke 16:10 (NET)
“The one who is faithful in a very little is also faithful in much, and the one who is dishonest in a very little is also dishonest in much.”
The way an entity handles small pieces of personal information reveals its character. An entity that treats consent as a formality to be gamed — rather than a trust to be honoured — demonstrates a deeper problem with integrity.
🔒
You Know the Law — But Do You Know What to Say?
Reading your rights is one thing. Using them under pressure — calmly, correctly, in the right words — is what actually protects you. Members get the scripted rebuttal for this exact situation: what to say first, what to say if they push back, the tone to use, and the constitutional provision to cite. Practise out loud with audio until it's automatic.
Unlock This Scenario — R89/month
137 Argentine scenarios across 17 domains
Not ready to subscribe? Get the free checklist first.
10 real rights scenarios — what to say, what to cite, what to refuse. Free, no card needed.
What They'll Say Next

Common Counter-Arguments

After you respond, they may push back with these arguments. Members get the full rebuttal for each.

They might say: “The consent was given when you accepted the terms and conditions, even if you didn't read them.”
🔒 Subscribe to see the full rebuttal and legal counter-argument.
They might say: “We are sharing data with partners for legitimate business purposes, which is allowed under the contractual relationship exception.”
🔒 Subscribe to see the full rebuttal and legal counter-argument.
Know Your Rights. Know Your Word.
137 Argentine law and Scripture scenarios — exact rebuttals, constitutional law, and Scripture. Practise out loud with audio. Free to start.
Try Free — free starter content
No credit card · Upgrade anytime for all 17 domains
Was this helpful?
Know the law. Now practise saying it. Every scenario ends with the exact words to use — read aloud, drill and keep.
Create a free account →
Think you know your rights? 5 real rights scenarios — find out where you’re at risk.
Take the Quiz →