A person is dehumanised and told they are unworthy of fair treatment based on class or gender
This argument groups an individual into a category ('people like you') and then assigns that category an inferior level of deserving. This is both a logical fallacy — individuals cannot be validly judged solely by a group attribute — and a form of dehumanisation, which strips away individual worth. It also assumes the speaker has the authority to determine what another human being 'deserves,' which is not a power any individual or institution holds under constitutional law.
If the other party says, 'This is just a formality; you should be grateful we're even following the law,' you can respond: 'Article 17 does not permit discrimination. It mandates that I receive the necessary documentation for my retirement procedures, and it does not condition that on my background. Your statement violates the principle of non-discrimination inherent in labor law.'
After you give your response, they may push back. Here is how to handle each counter-argument.