Identity & Dignity

People Like You Don't Deserve Better

A person is dehumanised and told they are unworthy of fair treatment based on class or gender

Free intermediate 8 minutes Domain 1 of 119

What They Said

“People like you don't deserve better. You should be happy with what you get.”
This phrase is used by employers, landlords, or authority figures to justify giving inferior conditions, pay, or treatment to someone based on their perceived social class, gender, race, or background.

How to Respond

That statement is discriminatory and not supported by Article 17 of the Labor Contract Law. The law requires equal treatment and does not allow inferior conditions based on personal characteristics.
Now say it out loud. The Advocate walks you through this scenario with audio, law references, and Scripture — so the words come out right when it matters.
Open the app — free

Dehumanisation / Stereotyping

This argument groups an individual into a category ('people like you') and then assigns that category an inferior level of deserving. This is both a logical fallacy — individuals cannot be validly judged solely by a group attribute — and a form of dehumanisation, which strips away individual worth. It also assumes the speaker has the authority to determine what another human being 'deserves,' which is not a power any individual or institution holds under constitutional law.

Your Legal Foundation

Ley de Contrato de Trabajo 20.744
“Article 17, subsection a) of Law 24.241 and its amendments, the employer may require the worker to initiate the relevant procedures, providing him with the certificates of services and other necessary documentation for those purposes.”
This law does not address discrimination or unequal treatment based on social class, gender, race, or background. It only concerns the employer's obligation to provide documentation when the worker initiates retirement procedures. Therefore, the phrase 'People like you don't deserve better' is not justified by this law.

God's Word on This

Genesis 1:27 (NET)
“God created humankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them, male and female he created them.”
Every human being — regardless of class, gender, or origin — bears the image of God, which is the foundation of equal and inherent worth.
James 2:1 (NET)
“My brothers and sisters, do not show prejudice if you possess faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ.”
Scripture explicitly forbids the kind of partiality that assigns different worth to people based on social status — it is incompatible with genuine faith.

Drill Prompt

If the other party says, 'This is just a formality; you should be grateful we're even following the law,' you can respond: 'Article 17 does not permit discrimination. It mandates that I receive the necessary documentation for my retirement procedures, and it does not condition that on my background. Your statement violates the principle of non-discrimination inherent in labor law.'

Blindside Counter-Arguments

After you give your response, they may push back. Here is how to handle each counter-argument.

They might say: “The law only mentions retirement procedures, not discrimination. So your claim about unequal treatment is irrelevant.”
Your response: While Article 17 specifically addresses retirement procedures, it is part of the broader Labor Contract Law which prohibits discriminatory treatment. The phrase you used is discriminatory and not justified by any provision of the law.
They might say: “You're overreacting; it's just a figure of speech, not a legal issue.”
Your response: Regardless of intent, such language can create a hostile work environment and may violate the principle of equal treatment. The law does not permit employers to base conditions on discriminatory factors.
Hear Your Rebuttal Out Loud
Audio playback, word-by-word highlighting, self-assessment drills, and 137 scenarios across 17 Argentine law domains. Free to start — no credit card needed.
Practise This Response — Free
Free starter content is available in the app
Was this helpful?
Know the law. Now practise saying it. Every scenario ends with the exact words to use — read aloud, drill and keep.
Create a free account →
Think you know your rights? 5 real rights scenarios — find out where you’re at risk.
Take the Quiz →