A partner denies that psychological and economic control constitute domestic violence
This argument relies on a false and narrow definition of abuse — one that only counts visible, physical violence. Many legal systems define domestic violence broadly to include emotional, psychological, and economic forms of control. The argument also uses the absence of shouting and hitting to construct an immunity claim — 'real' abuse is something else — which is a no true Scotsman fallacy applied to the definition of violence.
After you respond, they may push back with these arguments. Members get the full rebuttal for each.