Disability Rights

Our Building Has No Ramp — There Is Nothing We Can Do

Asserting your right to accessible public and commercial spaces under applicable law

Premium intermediate 8 minutes

What They Said

“Our building has no ramp — there is nothing we can do.”
A person who uses a wheelchair or has a mobility impairment visited a government department, bank, or business to access a service they are entitled to. They were told the building has no wheelchair access — no ramp, no lift — and the institution expressed no intention to remedy the situation, essentially turning the person away.

Structural Inconvenience Excuses Exclusion

A lack of accessible infrastructure is not a defence against a duty to provide access. Applicable law prohibits unfair discrimination against people with disabilities, and reasonable accommodation of disability is an affirmative duty. The failure to provide ramps, accessible entrances, or equivalent services is itself a form of unfair discrimination.

Your Legal Foundation

Ley 22.431
“Article 22 - Barriers in transport are understood to be those existing in the access and use of public transport means (land, air, and water) of short, medium, and long distance, and those that hinder the use of private means of transport by persons with reduced mobility, whose removal shall be pursued by observing the following criteria: a) Public transport vehicles shall have two reserved seats, marked and near the door, per car, for persons with reduced mobility. Such persons are authorized to get off through any door. Cars shall have non-slip flooring and space for canes, crutches, wheelchairs, and other elements used by such persons. In air transport, priority shall be given to assigning locations near access for passengers with reduced mobility. Land collective transport companies under national authority control must transport persons with disabilities free of charge on the route between their domicile and any destination they must attend for family, care, educational, work, or any other reasons that tend to favor their full social integration. Regulations will establish the comforts to be granted, the characteristics of passes to be exhibited, and sanctions for transporters in case of non-compliance. The franchise extends to a companion in case of documented need. (Paragraph substituted by”
This law addresses barriers in transport, not buildings. It does not require ramps or lifts in buildings. Therefore, the statement that nothing can be done about the lack of a ramp is not directly contradicted by this law, but the law does not provide a remedy for building access.

God's Word on This

Luke 14:13-14 (NET)
“But when you host a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind, and you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you.”
Scripture specifically names the disabled as those who must be actively included, not passively excluded. Buildings and institutions that make no effort to be accessible passively exclude — and the law treats this as active discrimination.
🔒
You Know the Law — But Do You Know What to Say?
Reading your rights is one thing. Using them under pressure — calmly, correctly, in the right words — is what actually protects you. Members get the scripted rebuttal for this exact situation: what to say first, what to say if they push back, the tone to use, and the constitutional provision to cite. Practise out loud with audio until it's automatic.
Unlock This Scenario — R89/month
137 Argentine scenarios across 17 domains
Not ready to subscribe? Get the free checklist first.
10 real rights scenarios — what to say, what to cite, what to refuse. Free, no card needed.

Common Counter-Arguments

After you respond, they may push back with these arguments. Members get the full rebuttal for each.

They might say: “But the law says 'barriers' generally, so it includes buildings.”
🔒 Subscribe to see the full rebuttal and legal counter-argument.
They might say: “The law requires free transport for disabled persons, so you must provide a ramp to get to the transport.”
🔒 Subscribe to see the full rebuttal and legal counter-argument.
Know Your Rights. Know Your Word.
137 Argentine law and Scripture scenarios — exact rebuttals, constitutional law, and Scripture. Practise out loud with audio. Free to start.
Try Free — free starter content
No credit card · Upgrade anytime for all 17 domains
Was this helpful?
Know the law. Now practise saying it. Every scenario ends with the exact words to use — read aloud, drill and keep.
Create a free account →
Think you know your rights? 5 real rights scenarios — find out where you’re at risk.
Take the Quiz →