Children's Rights

We Don't Need to Ask the Child

Parents override a child's right to be consulted on decisions that directly affect their life

Premium foundational 8 minutes

What They Said

“We do not need to ask the child — we are the parents and we decide what is best.”
This phrase is used when parents or guardians are making a significant decision affecting a child — such as school transfer, living arrangements, or medical treatment — and dismiss any suggestion that the child should be consulted.

Appeal to Authority / Non Sequitur

This argument is a non sequitur: the fact that parents have authority over a child does not logically follow that the child has no right to be consulted. Authority and consultation are not mutually exclusive. Parents can retain full decision-making power while still being required to hear the child's views. The argument also treats parental authority as absolute, which is rejected by children's rights principles in many legal systems.

Your Legal Foundation

Código Civil y Comercial de la Nación
“The minor has the right to be heard in any judicial process that concerns them as well as to participate in decisions about their person.”
Even though parents have legal representation rights, the law explicitly grants the child the right to be heard and participate in decisions about their person, which includes significant decisions like school transfer or medical treatment. Thus, dismissing the child's input outright violates this legal right.

God's Word on This

Colossians 3:21 (NET)
“Fathers, do not provoke your children, so they will not become discouraged.”
Scripture warns parents against actions that discourage or frustrate children — consistently excluding children from decisions that affect their lives risks exactly this harm.
Proverbs 15:22 (NET)
“Plans fail when there is no counsel, but with abundant advisers they are established.”
Seeking counsel — including from those most directly affected — leads to wiser decisions; dismissing the child's perspective deprives decision-making of a crucial source of insight.
🔒
You Know the Law — But Do You Know What to Say?
Reading your rights is one thing. Using them under pressure — calmly, correctly, in the right words — is what actually protects you. Members get the scripted rebuttal for this exact situation: what to say first, what to say if they push back, the tone to use, and the constitutional provision to cite. Practise out loud with audio until it's automatic.
Unlock This Scenario — R89/month
137 Argentine scenarios across 17 domains
Not ready to subscribe? Get the free checklist first.
10 real rights scenarios — what to say, what to cite, what to refuse. Free, no card needed.

Common Counter-Arguments

After you respond, they may push back with these arguments. Members get the full rebuttal for each.

They might say: “The child is too young to understand the implications, so their opinion shouldn't matter.”
🔒 Subscribe to see the full rebuttal and legal counter-argument.
They might say: “We are the legal representatives, so we exercise the child's rights, not the child.”
🔒 Subscribe to see the full rebuttal and legal counter-argument.
Know Your Rights. Know Your Word.
137 Argentine law and Scripture scenarios — exact rebuttals, constitutional law, and Scripture. Practise out loud with audio. Free to start.
Try Free — free starter content
No credit card · Upgrade anytime for all 17 domains
Was this helpful?
Know the law. Now practise saying it. Every scenario ends with the exact words to use — read aloud, drill and keep.
Create a free account →
Think you know your rights? 5 real rights scenarios — find out where you’re at risk.
Take the Quiz →