Children's Rights

It Is Discipline, Not Abuse

Corporal punishment is justified as traditional discipline when challenged as abuse

Premium intermediate 8 minutes

What They Said

“I will hit my child if I want to — that is called discipline, not abuse. My parents hit me and I turned out fine.”
This phrase is used by a parent when someone — a teacher, social worker, family member, or neighbour — challenges physical punishment of a child, invoking generational tradition to justify the practice.

Appeal to Tradition / Anecdotal Evidence

This argument relies on two separate logical flaws. First, it uses personal anecdotal evidence ('I turned out fine') to disprove a general harm — one person's subjective outcome cannot invalidate documented evidence of harm. Second, it appeals to tradition as moral justification, which fails because the legality and ethics of a practice are not determined by how long it has been practised. A court may have ruled definitively on this matter, but the reasoning here does not depend on any specific jurisdiction.

Your Legal Foundation

Código Civil y Comercial de la Nación
“Corporal punishment in any of its forms, mistreatment, and any act that harms or undermines the physical or mental integrity of children or adolescents is prohibited.”
The parent's statement that hitting a child is discipline and justified by tradition directly conflicts with the law, which absolutely prohibits corporal punishment regardless of cultural or generational justifications.

God's Word on This

Ephesians 6:4 (NET)
“Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger, but raise them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord.”
The biblical model of discipline is instruction and guidance — the command is not to be harsh or provoking, but to raise children through teaching rooted in the character of God.
Colossians 3:21 (NET)
“Fathers, do not provoke your children, so they will not become discouraged.”
Scripture's parenting standard guards against actions that damage children psychologically or emotionally — discipline that causes fear, harm, or discouragement falls outside the biblical model.
🔒
You Know the Law — But Do You Know What to Say?
Reading your rights is one thing. Using them under pressure — calmly, correctly, in the right words — is what actually protects you. Members get the scripted rebuttal for this exact situation: what to say first, what to say if they push back, the tone to use, and the constitutional provision to cite. Practise out loud with audio until it's automatic.
Unlock This Scenario — R89/month
137 Argentine scenarios across 17 domains
Not ready to subscribe? Get the free checklist first.
10 real rights scenarios — what to say, what to cite, what to refuse. Free, no card needed.

Common Counter-Arguments

After you respond, they may push back with these arguments. Members get the full rebuttal for each.

They might say: “But the law says 'malos tratos' (mistreatment), not all physical punishment. A spanking is not mistreatment.”
🔒 Subscribe to see the full rebuttal and legal counter-argument.
They might say: “My parents hit me and I turned out fine. This is how we raise children in our culture.”
🔒 Subscribe to see the full rebuttal and legal counter-argument.
Know Your Rights. Know Your Word.
137 Argentine law and Scripture scenarios — exact rebuttals, constitutional law, and Scripture. Practise out loud with audio. Free to start.
Try Free — free starter content
No credit card · Upgrade anytime for all 17 domains
Was this helpful?
Know the law. Now practise saying it. Every scenario ends with the exact words to use — read aloud, drill and keep.
Create a free account →
Think you know your rights? 5 real rights scenarios — find out where you’re at risk.
Take the Quiz →